Skip to content
Evidence Owner question + standard measurement method Applies to CNC-equipped M2 and M3 families Safety Supervised test cutting and sharp hot parts Updated 2026-08-21

Check X/Y scale and kerf

Scale and kerf are different errors. Axis scale changes the centerline distance commanded by motion; kerf compensation offsets the contour to account for removed material. Do not “fix” axis scale by changing kerf.

Make a useful test file

Create:

  • one large outside square or rectangle with distinct X and Y lengths;
  • one or more inside holes/slots;
  • engraved or marked axis labels away from measurement edges;
  • generous spacing and lead positions that do not damage the measurement faces.

Use dimensions large enough that measuring-tool uncertainty is small relative to the error. Include a known dimension to catch an inch/mm import problem before cutting.

Test sequence

  1. Verify the drawing's displayed dimensions in mLaser.
  2. Use clean, flat, known material and a stable known-good cut process.
  3. Disable or record contour compensation so its effect is known.
  4. Calibrate the head, simulate, frame without emission, and cut one coupon.
  5. Let the part cool; remove dross only in a way that does not change the reference faces.
  6. Measure outside X, outside Y, and inside features at multiple positions with a suitable calibrated tool.
  7. Record commanded size, measured size, direction, and repeatability.

Interpret the pattern

Pattern Check first
Everything is exactly 25.4× wrong Unit conversion
X wrong by a percentage, Y correct X axis scale/configuration or mechanics
Both axes wrong by same percentage Drawing/import scale before machine calibration
Outside too small and holes too large by similar amounts Kerf/contour side or compensation direction
Repeated dimensions scatter Loose mechanics, backlash, slip, heat distortion, or inconsistent cut quality
Error changes with travel direction Backlash/mechanical or directional cut-quality issue

Before changing calibration

Repeat the coupon and measure again. Check belts/racks/couplings and axis condition using the approved maintenance procedure, and confirm a rotary axis configuration was not left active. Export the original machine parameters. Only change axis calibration using the documented Gweike method and a traceable measurement—not a service-password screenshot or a single rough coupon.

After axis motion is proven, calculate kerf from measured test features and apply the correct inside/outside compensation in the job workflow. Re-cut and document the result.

The owner-community prompt that inspired this guide is preserved at the Gweike M-Series community forum; this method is independently written and has no dependence on an attached forum file.